| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
101. Three New Team Play Anti-Gank Modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Ferrosan wrote: Frostys Virpio wrote: Ferrosan wrote: Disclaimer: I think highsec ganking is a really exciting part of EVE, and so far I've managed (on my mains) never to lose a freighter. I do love the thrill of ...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.02 17:45:47
|
102. Navy ship updates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If talking about the TFI, specifiying which TFI is meant is a useful thing, as the fleet phoon and the tempest fleet both come out as TFI. That said, the slicer is already really powerful, and the hookbill is not a beginers ship, but shines reall...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.02 17:43:23
|
103. Three New Team Play Anti-Gank Modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ferrosan wrote: It seems to me that if a corporation of 10 (or 300) players wanted to be sure a freighter got through Niarja there's really no way for them to team up and do it. Instalock 4 web loki or minmatar recon. Counter to being bump...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.02 17:36:42
|
104. Weapon Defense System - Cluster Mines - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Madd Adda wrote: Amarisen Gream wrote: Danika Princip wrote: We have a thread to keep awful 'nerf cloaks' ideas in you know. Yes. There is a thread for AFK cloaking. When looking at that, thread I didn't feel my idea fit in - due to i...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.02 14:20:36
|
105. Weapon Defense System - Cluster Mines - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Posting in a stealth nerf cloaks thread. That said, other than being abusable in some kinds of camps and a great anti-tackle/ drone system if done even slightly wrong, OP looks reasonablish.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.02 14:19:09
|
106. NPE feedback Q and A - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Rise wrote: Q: 'Starting skills are a huge barrier, can we give a lot more to new players' A: Yes. But this is not a simple change. You guys seem fairly agreed that the small amount of starting skills, combined with a high amount of 'mu...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.02 14:08:08
|
107. Non-terrible role specific new player ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Throwaway Sam Atild wrote: Rivr Luzade wrote: As an example: A Dampener specific ship like a Maulus, but without the training for damps and the ship bonuses and with not terrible stats? Why would one fly a Maulus then to begin with? If the o...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 18:30:06
|
108. Non-terrible role specific new player ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think this is a concept which needs to be dismissed. Doing such a thing simplifies the game to the point where it just, well, isn't eve. It would also seem to require a lot of dev time, and lots of work from the balance team. Eve is a game whic...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 17:04:26
|
109. Audio alert for ore hold? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It may have been an intentional thing. You know, so you have to listen to the audio alert from your mining lasers going cold because there isn't space.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 16:46:30
|
110. Add option to import external list of scammers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Petre en Thielles wrote: And there are literally zero honest traders in jita local. Eh, you see about 3 a day who are honest traders, and 5-10 scammers who admit it's a scam and want money for lulz value of a scammer admitting it.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 15:55:28
|
111. New Salvage Ship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I am still of the opinion that this can be handled easily enough by creative fitting of a destroyer, and that creative fittings of wierd utility ships should be an art form that is encouraged, rather than one with a defined hull in each niche.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 15:49:53
|
112. Please save corp traders - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Elenahina wrote: I actually recently got quite a bit of unlove for posting this same idea . Maybe I'm just an unlikable person. Anyway, yes. Not really a bunch, just Iain Cariaba being his usual, lovable (with a hammer) self. Though, since...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 15:45:26
|
113. Sansha Kuvakei looking for skilled engineers! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
See, I still think that they're beautiful for hunting Orthrii and Garmurs with, because one good sling shot and now you have caught them with your own scram, and suddenly you are 4x faster (prop on, webbed vs MWD shut down and webbed) and thus abl...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 15:39:55
|
114. I want - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Please check top post. CCP Falcon wrote: Threads like "I want XXX module. Give it to me now," are not constructive.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 15:30:18
|
115. Please save corp traders - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Donnachadh wrote: +1 to players being able to set the length of a contract when it is created. -1 to allowing contracts to be extended once they are issued. Any particular reason on not allowing extension of contracts other than auctions?
- by James Baboli - at 2015.07.01 15:12:00
|
116. Column on overview to demystify % chance hit or dmg - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gregor Parud wrote: James Baboli wrote: Gregor Parud wrote: Another attempt to try and have sig radius show on the overview, I wonder which alliance these alts belong to to try and make this somehow happen. Hint, it has nothing to do with...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.06.30 07:34:18
|
117. Column on overview to demystify % chance hit or dmg - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gregor Parud wrote: Another attempt to try and have sig radius show on the overview, I wonder which alliance these alts belong to to try and make this somehow happen. Hint, it has nothing to do with "newbies" and everything to do with "lol, now...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.06.29 17:48:42
|
118. New Ship Class - Fast Response Frigate - Hellcat - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like it in theory. That theory being that fast response frigates are a thing. Like interceptors fit for combat.... I cannot stress how broken, wrong and unfun this sort of a ship would be if anyone were to implement it as you propose.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.06.29 13:45:22
|
119. Column on overview to demystify % chance hit or dmg - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Coding nightmare. Reduces all of the things about knowing your ship and weapons. i.e. skills WAY more free intel than the one thing needed to be able to derive approximately what it is (the signature radius) -1.
- by James Baboli - at 2015.06.29 13:43:25
|
120. Command Destroyers, Please make it happen - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lloyd Roses wrote: Zan Shiro wrote: just how fast are the roams/ops going they can't wait for a CS/link t3 to keep up? Or link BC if no pro link support on hand yet? A CS takes 7secs to warp and then only warps at 3.3AU or something like ...
- by James Baboli - at 2015.06.29 02:45:42
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |